Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Took Money from Pro-Regime Iranians

It appears that the depraved and out-of-control Democrats are still seeking to uncover President Donald Trump in a Quid Pro Quo scenario in order to evict him from the White House. In fact, they will salivate at the chance to hurt him even if the facts are not on their side. One can only wish that the Deep State operators such as Speaker Pelosi, Chairman Schiff, Chairman Nadler and Minority Leader Schumer would seriously examine the shenanigans of Hillary Clinton when she accepted campaign contributions from the world’s leading supporter of terrorism, the Islamic nation of Iran.

Hillary and two of her enablers from the news media.

Senator Hillary Clinton had accused President George W. Bush of mishandling the threat from Iran, while she had been accepting money from supporters of the renegade Iranian regime.

Wealthy businessmen Hassan Nemazee and Faraj Aalaei who are associated with the American Iranian Council, a pro-regime, anti-sanctions group, are vocal Clinton supporters and contributors. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Namazee has contributed $4,000 to Clinton’s reelection while Aalaei contributed $1,000.

Insight Magazine, published by the Washington Times, describes their lobby this way: “the American-Iranian Council [AIC], a pro-regime lobbying group [are] trying to get Congress and the Bush administration to lift the trade embargo on Iran.”  

According to reports in Hillary Clinton’s home state, she’s also raising money from Gati Kashani, another figure linked with the Iranian Mullahs and who also supports the regime.

On its website, the Iranian American Political Action Committee (PAC) noted, “On Friday, June 3rd [2005], Iranian-American friends of the Hillary Clinton Senate re-election campaign hosted a fundraising event in honor of Senator Clinton. The event took place at the home of Gita and Behzad Kashani in Los Altos Hills, California.”

The PAC favors relaxing or eliminating Visa rule for Iranians coming to the United States and believes that Clinton would be helpful in achieving their goals. The Federal Bureau of Investigation opposes such liberalization of the visa process for the terrorist state.

Many believe that FBI Director James Comey knew he had to “protect” Hillary Clinton from the “long arm of the law.”

But in full pander mode, the Iranian PAC reported that Clinton attacked United States Visa policy. “Senator Clinton went on to address the audience on topics specifically relevant to the Iranian-American community. She discussed immigration and acknowledged the difficulties Iranian nationals have in obtaining visas to visit family members residing in America. She stated, ‘Our visa policy is not only unfair but it’s not good for America.'”

During her speech yesterday Senator Clinton attacked the Bush Administration, charging that the US government has wasted precious time in dealing with the looming Iranian nuclear threat.

“I believe that we lost critical time in dealing with Iran because the White House chose to downplay the threats and to outsource the negotiations,” Clinton said during a speech at Princeton University, referring to American willingness to allow European powers to handle talks with Tehran.

“We cannot and should not — must not — permit Iran to build or acquire nuclear weapons,” Clinton added. “In order to prevent that from occurring, we must have more support vigorously and publicly expressed by China and Russia, and we must move as quickly as feasible for sanctions in the United Nations.”

This is the exact opposite of what she’s said regarding the run up to the Iraq war. Democrat Party bigwigs accused Bush then of not working with our allies — France, Germany, Russia — and not allowing the United Nations more time to deal with the Saddam Hussein regime.

According to critics, Senator Clinton’s modus operandi is to tell audiences what she believes they wish to hear. Tell Americans to get tough on Iran so as to present herself as tough on national security, then tell Iranians she wants to help them.

At least she did use the “plantation” word which I believe was calculated to bring about controversy as was her latest diatribes against Bush. The release of the Barrett Report brings up questions of her and her husband’s own — excuse the phrase — culture of corruption.

She’s done this before when she criticized the Bush Administration’s lack of resolve to stop rampant illegal immigration and to increase border security. However, when a bill went to the senate that would increase funding for border patrol agents and additional detention facilities, she and the senior Senator from New York, Chuck Schumer, voted no.

Then when speaking before a Latino group in California, Hillary told the audience that she would work to get them healthcare and education assistance.

John Spencer, the former Yonkers Mayor and Vietnam combat veteran who will challenge Senator Clinton in November, made the following statement, “Senator Clinton voted against the very munitions necessary to avoid a nuclear confrontation with Iran while at the same time accepting money from supporters of the Iranian Mullahs. Senator Clinton lacks the credibility to keep New York safe and she should return this tainted money.”


Jim Kouri, CPP, is founder and CEO of Kouri Associates, a homeland security, public safety and political consulting firm. He's formerly Fifth Vice-President, now a Board Member of the National Association of Chiefs of Police, a columnist, and a contributor to the nationally syndicated talk-radio program, the Chuck Wilder Show.. He's former chief of police at a New York City housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed "Crack City" by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. In addition, he served as director of public safety at St. Peter's University and director of security for several major organizations. He's also served on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers throughout the country.

2 thoughts on “Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Took Money from Pro-Regime Iranians

  • October 21, 2019 at 5:14 pm

    To see what President Bush had to go up against from the U.N., read the book “The Greatest Threat” by Richard Butler. Butler was the U.N. Ambassador from Australia and the Chairman of UNSCOM, the United Nations Special Commission on Iraq. Butler outlines the rules for the peace agreement made at the end of the first Gulf War and the violations committed, at gun point, by the Iraqis on orders from Saddam Hussein. When the UNSCOM member representatives were attempting to verify that the military bases were complying with the agreement, they were met with armed guards, stopped from entering the bases, but could see the trucks loaded with, what was presumed to be weapons that they were not allowed to have. Trucks tracked that went to Syria. After repeated attempts to sway the U.N. as to what was happening in Iraq, the President of the United Nations sided with Russia and China to thwart any attempts stop Iraq from moving materials from their bases. The nations who have veto powers, and it only takes one, blocked every attempt to force Saddam Hussein into compliance. By the time the United States took action against Iraq, the weapons of mass destruction had been moved to Syria or relocated to a hidden location to be recovered later. The narrative of Iraq not having weapons of mass destruction continues to this day, bolstered by the fake news outlets. The appearance of wrong doing, or psy to play, on the behalf of Hillary Clinton is obvious, yet ignored by the fake news media.

  • October 21, 2019 at 10:37 pm

    Hi there! Happy Monday morning – the evil bastards are exposed 🙂

    “Tom Fitton Breaking — Obama admin knew weapons were shipped from Benghazi to Syrian jihadists…

    DOD records obtained by Judicial Watch contain the first official documentation that the Obama administration knew that weapons were being shipped from the Port of Benghazi to rebel troops in Syria.”


    And a treasure trove of evidence



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *