During his presidential campaign against “Crooked Hillary Clinton,” Republican maverick Donald Trump said during his second presidential debate, that he would have his new Attorney General — whoever that may be — appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Clinton.
While the news media took it to mean another investigation of Hillary’s home-cooked Internet server and the transmission of classified information on her unprotected email system, it was obvious to most law enforcement officers listening to him that he meant something else: the Clintons’ organized crime enterprise masquerading as a charity known as the Clinton Foundation.
Trump denounced the former Secretary of State on an almost daily basis during his campaign not only for her use of a personal email server — which the FBI said they believed that there was a 99% probability it was hacked by foreign intelligence agencies — but also Bill and Hillary Clinton’s alleged “pay to play” relationship. In fact, evidence exists that reveals there was little separating the activities between the Clinton Foundation and the Hillary Clinton-led State Department.
The Clinton family’s charity is arguably the most extensive money laundering operation in the world today. In fact, it is not difficult for even a rookie cop or a recent law school graduate to connect the dots in order to prove criminality.
“As far as I’m concerned, pay-to-play is just a fancy or politically correct way of saying bribery. The scam can be as simple as two people talking and one receives an envelope full of cash, while the other benefits from obtaining something he isn’t legally entitled to,” said former police detective and corporate security investigator Bernard Hoyt.
Here are the steps Det. Hoyt believes were taken by the Clintons and their henchmen and henchwomen:
First they needed to open up an office for a foreign “charity” preferably in a country with lax oversight of charities and their donors. In this case they didn’t need to go far when they opened one in Canada.
Foreign government officials or businessmen then contribute to the Canadian charity. In the Clinton Foundation case more than 1,000 contributed hundreds of millions of dollars. The Canadian charity officials — in this case a Bill Clinton pal named Frank Giustra — then “bundle” these separate donations, much the same way that campaign contributions are bundled, and then a huge contribution to the Clinton Foundation charity is made.
In order to avoid detection, the Clinton Foundation and the co-conspirators at the Canadian charity hide behind a Canadian law that protects the identification of individual donors, according to Det. Hoyt.
The Clinton Foundation then spends some of the non-taxable cash for legitimate charity work. But experts have stated that the Clinton Foundation has donated between 10 and 15 percent of the donations to legitimate charity work. The majority of its liquid assets goes to enrich the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton’s lavish salaries, and lavish lifestyles, particularly travel, and virtually all tax free. In one year alone, the foundation spent over $8 million in travel expenses. Chelsea Clinton’s opulent wedding, reception and honeymoon was also charged to the “charity.”
Here is a case in which foreign money, much of it from other countries, goes into the Clinton family’s pockets tax-free and untraceable back to the original donors.
While the news media pretends ignorance, the truth known to any cop worth his or her salt is that the Clinton Foundation is a money-laundering scheme that makes the Mafia look like amateurs.