Mueller’s Testimony: GOP Must Be Prepared to Expose Reps. Schiff and Nadler Mendacity

Clinton criminal enterprise? Witness tampering and money laundering: Please be advised that this report explains how the Clinton Family’s alleged money laundering enterprise brought millions of dollars from suspicious donors to the Clinton Foundation’s coffers on a money trail that ran through Canada.

Former special counsel Robert Mueller testified before the House Judiciary Committee and House Intelligence Committee, Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, of New York, on Wednesday as was announced.

Mueller is responding to each committee’s subpoena, and each will be holding separate hearings. All members will have five minutes to question the former special counsel.

Rep. Adam Schiff, of California, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told reporters Mueller was “very reluctant” to appear.

“If Mueller and the Democrats get their way during the hearings carried on live television, they will have scammed their way into creating the illusion of Trump ‘Crimes and Misdemeanors’ that can be used to drive him out of the White House. These are crafty, godless people with whom Trump and American patriots must deal,” said Peter Boslow, a former police inspector and special forces officer.

“Perhaps the Republican members of these committees would be better off pointing at the sins of the Clintons in and out of office, as well as Mueller’s connection to their alleged criminal enterprise that garnered them millions-of-dollars in ‘gifts,’ donations and gratuities from foreign governments, foreign businesses and foreign political organizations,” Boslow told Conservative Base.

One of the highlights of the hearing was when Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, a former state judge, grilled former Special Counsel Robert Mueller about his friendship with fired FBI Director James Comey, his Trump-hating staff and exposed Mueller as a puppet of his staff when Mueller could not say that he wrote his own May 29 press conference statement.

Amazingly, Mueller initially denied being friends with Comey, who succeeded him as FBI Director under President Obama, saying that they were “business associates” who “both started out at the Justice Department about the same time.”  Several commentators, including Prof. Alan Dershowitz, believe that Mueller appears far from being in control of his investigation.

While former presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton claims the U.S. State Department was successful in achieving its tasks under her direction, it appears that once again the former First Lady and Senator from New York is exaggerating her successes during her tenure as Secretary of State. On the campaign trail, Clinton – who claims she still believes there is gender inequality and the continued bullying of woman in America – remained silent about a report that told voters a different story about her fighting for women’s rights.

For example, reported incidents of sexual harassment at the State Department have almost tripled under both Secretary Clinton and current Secretary John Kerry, according to an  inspector general’s report.

“The female politician who says she wants to be women’s champion as President of the United States, helped her allegedly lecherous husband to all but destroy Bill Clinton’s accusers. In fact, Hillary [Clinton] lead a special ‘war room’ committee to help cover up what she termed ‘the nuts and sluts.’ I guess now she needs the sluts’ votes,” said a former corporate security director, Lester Sorrenson. who specialized in investigating hostile work environment cases.

“Because her husband was being sued by one of the women targeted by the Clinton clan, why were there no charges brought against Hillary Clinton for witness tampering? These people got away with not just some minor violations but with major infractions including intimidating witnesses and other criminal conspiracies,” Sorrenson said.

While Clinton is campaigning on both her support for women and her intention to help woman overcome their powerlessness in the nation’s workplaces, her own personal record on protecting women and their civil rights appears lacking in the latest report. The report by Inspector General Steve Linck shows a disturbing increase in reported harassment investigations within the State Department during the past few years and it recommends a mandatory harassment training program for all employees at all levels within the department.

In the section regarding key findings, the report states: “A significant increase in reported harassment inquiries in the Department of State over the past few fiscal years supports the need for mandatory harassment training for Department of State employees.”

The IG noted that reported harassment incidents rose from 88 cases in 2011 to 248 in 2014, Kerry’s second year as secretary. According to former sex crimes investigator and forensic psychologist Karen King-Howard, it’s probably a “safe bet that if this report – which was reported in the news media on Friday – gains traction in the news media, Clinton and Kerry will point fingers at one another or work together to find a scapegoat to throw under the Obama bus.”

Besides those considered formal complaints lodged through proper channels, there were hundreds of informal complaints that were made known during the same period. In 2014, 43 percent of new complaints filed involved accusations of harassment or unfair hiring or promotion practices. Meanwhile 38 percent of the complaints alleged sex discrimination or workplace reprisals.

“While Mrs. Clinton is out there criticizing men and businesses about their alleged mistreatment of women, on her watch at the State Department female and male employees were sexually harassed, bullied and exposed to a hostile work environment. It’s the epitome of hypocrisy but then again that’s par for the course with the Bill and Hillary Clinton team,” said a political strategist and former prosecuting attorney Michael Baker.

“The woman who says she wants to be women’s champion as President of the United States, helped her allegedly lecherous husband to all but destroy Bill Clinton’s accusers. In fact, Hillary [Clinton] lead a special ‘war room’ committee to help cover up what she termed ‘bimbo eruptions.’ I guess now she need the bimbos’ votes,” said Carlos Murphy, a former corporate security director who specialized in investigating hostile work environment cases. “How many women were ridiculed, harassed and smeared by our wannabe ‘champion?’ And she even had the majority of news outlets helping her,” said Murphy, a former New York police detective.

According civil-rights activist and radio talk host Kevin Jackson, a/k/a The Black Sphere, the Clinton family’s charity is arguably the most expansive money laundering operation in the world. He then explained how it works:

1. You create a separate foreign “charity.” In this case one in Canada.

2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did – contributing mega millions. I’m sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin’s buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).

3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.

4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors. The Canadian “charity” includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted. As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. security t risk.

5. The Clinton Foundation then spends some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Experts estimate that The Clinton Foundation has donated no more than 15 percent of the donations to charitable pursuits. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton’s lavish salaries, and lavish lifestyle, particularly travel, and virtually all tax free. In on year alone, the foundation spent over $8 million in travel expenses.

6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world’s best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these “clerical errors” and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.

7. Net result – foreign money, much of it from other countries, goes into the Clinton’s pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering.

This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.