Detection of Deception in Blasey Ford’s Testimony and Statements

A sticking point in the current Brett Kavanaugh-Christine Blasey Ford non-stop feeding frenzy for many law enforcement or intelligence officers — who depend on “tradecraft” that aids in detecting deceit with or without a polygraph, a psychological stress analyzer or it’s cousin, the voice stress analyzer — is the ultra-partisan propaganda being released by the Democratic Party’s officeholders to their close associates in the once independent and suspicious news media.

While these last few weeks appear to have seen a reduction in the amount of news coverage afforded Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his so-called “crack team of investigators” probing the evidence-deficient Trump-Russian Collusion scandal, according to at least five of this writer’s (Jim Kouri) law enforcement/intelligence community colleagues, why isn’t anyone being even-handed in their use of investigative tactics.

For example, it didn’t take long for the former FBI director Mueller to announce his successful operation to get Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn to plead guilty to lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation interrogators. It’s also one of the tactics used against President George W. Bush’s staffer, Scooter Libby, in the phony CIA-Valerie Plame investigation. Libby pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI. Both Flynn and Libby worked for Republican presidents and both found themselves in a jackpot that had noting to do with Valerie Plame or Russian-Trump collusion to beat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential race.

However, does anyone see the FBI or any federal agency investigating the Prof. Christine Blasey Ford testimony or any of her statements? Here are a few of the discrepancies observed when the Palo Alto University professor testified against Judge Kavanaugh who has been dragged through the mud by low-lives who have a capital “D” after their name or their news media comrades.

1. Afraid to Fly:  Blasey Ford told the GOP senators about a mental condition that made air travel for her a horrifying experience that prevents traveling in airliners or helicopters terrifying to the point of panicking. Professor of Psychology Ford,– observers were told by the Democrats and the “fake” news media — would need to drive or be driven from Palo Alto to Washington, D.C. to testify before the Senate Judicial Committee.

Her fear of flying claim didn’t hold water since a background check of Prof. Ford revealed that she lived for a year in Honolulu,and had vacationed in Tahiti and other areas of the Pacific. She did that traveling on airliners.

Also the good professor regularly flew from California to the east coast to visit members of her family. \

Her “fear of flying” claim collapsed completely when it was revealed that she had flown out to D.C. to testify before the judiciary committee and not one senator — Democrat or Republican — questioned her about the discrepancy.

“Someone should have asked her ‘were you lying then about being afraid to fly or are you lying now about your frequent flyer miles, Prof. Ford?’ No one even seemed to notice or care about this discrepancy in her testimony and her lame excuse. In other words, she lied,” said former police detective Carlos de la Garza.

2. Christine Is NOT a Psychologist:  Blasey Ford allowed the news media to report, and the senate committee to believe, that she’s a licensed psychologist. In fact, She verbally indicated to the senate committee that she was a “research psychologist.” Listed her psychologist designation on the Palo Alto University web site page, and in several other listings. The Washington Post and the Atlantic   quickly got rid of the “research’ part and repeatedly asserted that she was a licensed psychologist, with no request for a correction from the Blasey Ford camp. That, too, is a big lie.  Although she holds a doctorate in that field, she lacks professional certification.

Furthermore, she is aware she tried to beef up her curriculum vitae which originally stated that she was a “research psychologist.”  In the tradition of Hillary Clinton and other Democrats, Ford’s web page has been “scrubbed” clean in order to avoid detection of her deception.

According to former organized crime control detective, David McCallister, “Kavanaugh’s accusers on the committee are proven liars – Feinstein in withholding the letter in the first place (not to mention denying how it became public), Cory Booker concerning his good friend T-Bone, along with his “Spartacus moment”, Blumenthal concerning his heroism in Vietnam.

Then you have the feminized news media members who are so connected to the Democratic Party that it’s difficult to see where the reporters’ heads end and the politicians’ butts begin.

What’s almost a theatrical farce is the fact that Kavanaugh is obviously more honest than any of his accusers. Their perpetual “get out of jail free card” is their position on the killing of unborn babies. There are many who believe the Democratic Party’s logo of a Donkey should be replaced with the image of a mutilated corpse of an aborted baby who was killed just seconds before becoming a protected human being.