Democratic officials favor Muslim over Christian refugees: Study

If you’ve ever wondered if the Democrats favor Muslim refugees pouring into the United States over offering Middle Eastern Christians asylum in the USA, there appears to be evidence of the existence of just such a paradox. A study by the pollsters at Pew Research reveals that Democrats favor Muslim refugees — even unvetted refugees from nations involved in jihad — because the overwhelming majority of Muslims prefer Democrats over Republicans.
Democratic apologists for Muslim terrorists often re-define the meaning of the word Jihad.
Democratic apologists for Muslim terrorists often re-define the meaning of the word Jihad.

The report by Pew Research reveals that when it comes to political and social views, Muslims are far more likely to identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party (70%) than the Republican Party (11%). They also appear to favor a bigger government providing more services (68%) over a smaller government providing fewer services (21%).

These Muslim refugees, when they register to vote, are expected to overwhelmingly register as Democratic Party voters and will remain on public assistance.

Christians, on the other hand, are more likely to vote with the Republican Party and become self-sufficient. Tragically, this could be one of the major reasons persecuted minority Christians were basically ignored by the Obama administration. For example, of the recent 10,000 war refugees allowed access to the U.S. fewer than 60 of them were Catholic or Protestant Christians.


“I’m not by nature a cynic, but it’s not hard for me to believe that the Democratic Party places more importance on rescuing Muslims that will aid in insuring Democratic control of the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives,” said former counter-terrorism unit police officer Peter Bierney.

The U.S. welcomes more than twice as many refugees as all countries from the rest of the industrialized world combined. But for left-wing politicians and activists, the number of Muslims entering the U.S. is never enough and U.S. borders should remain wide open and Muslims should be welcomed with open arms.
These same “progressive” politicians and activists give many the impression that they only have such tremendous generosity for Muslim refugees and rarely, if ever, speak out for persecuted minority Christian refugees.

Arab countries

“In his eight-years in office President [Barack Hussein] Obama and his administration allowed more Muslim refugees into the U.S. than at any other time in American history. A closer look at his actions, and those of his fellow-party members, reveals paradoxical evidence that the motivation to resettle Muslim refugees is not based on humanitarian concern. They just want millions of new voters,” said Capt. Jerry Felder, NOPD-Ret.

“Refugee resettlement should be based on persecution and threat of death, not on politics. There is also strong evidence that many Muslims hold views that clash with Western norms,” says Christian Freedom International (CFI) President Jim Jacobson.

A 2011 Pew survey found that 40 percent of Pakistani Muslims believed it is often or sometimes justified to kill a woman engaged in premarital sex or adultery in order to protect the family’s honor.

In the United Kingdom police recorded more than 11,000 “honor” crimes between 2010 and 2014. A British think tank counted 18 honor killings in that country from 2010 to 2014.

A 2013 survey sponsored by Pew Research Center found that 99 percent of Muslims in Afghanistan and 91 percent of Iraqi Muslims favored making Sharia law the official law of their countries.

NACOP Chiefs of Police - James Kouri

Jim Kouri is a member of the Board of Advisors and a former vice president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police, Inc. a 501 (c) (3) not-for-profit organization incorporated in Florida in May 1967. The Association was organized for educational and charitable activities for law enforcement officers in command ranks and supervisory agents of state & federal law enforcement agencies as well as leaders in the private security sector. NACOP also provides funding to small departments, officers and the families of those officers paralyzed and disabled in the line of duty.

4 thoughts on “Democratic officials favor Muslim over Christian refugees: Study

  • February 19, 2017 at 8:28 pm

    No Sharia anywhere in America. You can take that & go back to your terrorist country.

  • February 20, 2017 at 1:00 am

    What the supporters of the 21st century DNC-MSM Syndicate either choose or refuse to acknowledge is the endless hall of mirrors and deceit with which proponents of Islam engage “Dar al-Gharb”, the “house of the West” (or more literally) “Realm of Heathens”… which is EVERYONE who isn’t already Muslim or subjected to their rule under Sharia.

    Islam recognizes, distinguishes, accepts, teaches, and even ENCOURAGES at least four different forms of lies, as taken from their own holy scriptures in the Quran.

    In the present existential conflict, each and every one of these ploys WILL be at-play and in effect at any and all times along the way. It is thus utterly futile to pursue treaties, amnesties, pacts, or other formalized agreements with any of them, either individually or collectively. At any moment when it will benefit Islam at large or even in market deals between shopkeepers in Tikrit, who are deemed “clever” when they can “get one over” on each other or their customers.

    To wit:
    ● “Taqiyya – Saying something that isn’t true as it relates to the Muslim identity.

    ● “Kitman – Lying by omission. An example would be when Muslim apologists quote only a fragment of verse 5:32 (that if anyone kills “it shall be as if he had killed all mankind”) while neglecting to mention that the rest of the verse (and the next) mandate murder in undefined cases of “corruption” and “mischief.”

    ● “Tawriya – Intentionally creating a false impression.

    ● “Muruna – ‘Blending in’ by setting aside some practices of Islam or Sharia in order to advance others.

    “Though not called Taqiyya by name, Muhammad clearly used deception when he signed a 10-year treaty with the Meccans that allowed him access to their city while he secretly prepared his own forces for a takeover. The unsuspecting residents were conquered in easy fashion after he broke the treaty two years later. Some of the people in the city who had trusted him at his word were executed.”


    (Note especially the embedded links/citations throughout the page…)

  • February 20, 2017 at 7:47 pm

    What did they expect, they polled 800 Muslims, they got exactly the result they wanted.

    If Muslims want to be judged by Sharia Law, they can relocate to Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, or other muslim majority country.

    If they don’t favor the Constitution, get the hell out, now!

  • February 20, 2017 at 9:10 pm

    Refugees should not be allowed to vote period. They have no vested interest in our country except what is in it for them.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *