Judge Jeanine Pirro Exposes Special Counsel Mueller As a Political Hack

“The list of Obama officials who may soon see the inside of a courtroom is quickly piling up. They include but are not limited to James Comey, Sally Yates, Andrew McCabe, Samantha Power, Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes, Rod Rosenstein, James Clapper, John Brennan and of course, Loretta Lynch. What would be of great interest is what part Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes played in the Trump caper, since Rice is married to the former ABC Executive Producer Ian Cameron and Ben Rhode’s brother David Rhodes is the president of CBS News.” Judge Jeanine Pirro

One of the nation’s most popular television news and commentary anchors, Judge Jeanie Pirro, is a former New York criminal court judge, Westchester County district attorney, and senatorial candidate who lost to Hillary Clinton with the help of a news media full of Clintonista water carriers.

As part of her illustrious legal career, Judge Pirro cultivated friendships with those she believed were honest, well-educated leaders such as former FBI Director Robert Mueller.

However, after witnessing Mueller’s politically-motivated investigation of President Donald Trump for the alleged “high crime and misdemeanor” of colluding with the Russian government to beat Hillary Clinton as well as the reports of spying on Trump and members of his campaign team by the Democratic Party, Fox News Channel’s host Jeanine Pirro went after former Special Counsel Robert Mueller for what she believes are his selfish reasons for speaking about his case against Trump. She also called him a “political hack” for the Deep State.

Mueller spoke for the first time to reporters since the Russia investigation started and it appeared that he was hinting at impeachment.

“The reason that Robert Mueller (a former FBI director) spoke publicly is because he was more worried about his legacy than he was in protecting this country,” Pirro said.

“This is counter to everything he was taught and supposedly stood for, and is not only disappointing but politically damaging,” she said.

“Mueller had a case of seller’s remorse,” she said.  “When the seller regrets what he’s already sold. It seems Bob is afflicted with a serious case of this remorse.

“The original report didn’t hurt Trump enough. Ask yourself one question. Why after 10 weeks, after the special counsel report is submitted, does Mueller unilaterally decide to hold a press conference to say he’s closing shop?”

“And why does Mueller do a Jim Comey and say I didn’t charge but only because dot dot dot? He does it to rally the left because the Mueller report didn’t hurt enough.”

“Mind you, the report is the best evidence of the investigation,” Pirro noted. “It is the investigation. There is no need to unilaterally emphasize or add to the document.”

“Not Robert Mueller. He decides to jump into the political fray just like his pal Jim Comey did. And now the calls for impeachment are echoing throughout Congress. This was not the case when the report was committed.”

“So Mueller, I imagine at the behest of the left, gives them what they need to jump-start the calls for impeachment,” she said.

“But nothing has changed in the report. The only thing that changed is Mueller deciding to create chaos and havoc, as if two years of an investigation of the president showing absolutely no Trump Russia collusion and no obstruction are not enough. But that’s what Mueller did. Muddy up the waters and charge up the left.”

“Now Mueller is adding, ‘Look, I’m not confident you didn’t commit a crime.’ That’s sheer lunacy,” the Fox News host said.

“I don’t know a prosecutor in this country who ever said after a grand jury investigation, ‘I’m not sure he didn’t commit a crime.’”

“You will either indict or you don’t. You don’t come out and say, ‘You know, I’m not indicting him, but I’m telling you he ain’t a good guy.’”

“Every prosecutor knows if you don’t indict someone, you stop there. So what was the point of the 400-plus report. The report doesn’t say, ‘I’m not confident you didn’t commit a crime.’ So what’s the endgame now?”

“Let’s take a second to talk about collusion,” she said. “Not the Trump Russia collusion. But what about collusion between Mueller and the Democrats?”

“The Democrats are desperate. They need Mueller to shake things up so they can rally the troops around impeachment,” she said.